24 replies to this topic

[warthog]

The_Jonas, on 27 January 2012 - 03:33 PM, said:

It's related to the Babb article.

By airing dirty laundry, he voided the remainder of his contract and it would not be due to him.

Now this is assuming Haley was the source feeding Babb info. By doing so he essentially forfieted his remaining money.

I think you are right on this. If he had a confidentially agreement, he broke it with the Babb story. That story actually quoted Haley and if he was not supposed to talk, the Chiefs have a real good reason to not pay him. Good thought Jonas, I think that is dead on. Makes more sense than not paying him for a bad coaching decision.

[Chi-town_Chief]

NOLA, on 27 January 2012 - 03:48 PM, said:

I think for that game he only had a few plays, but I'm wondering if his playing time would've been more the following week had he played well in his limited time. Again, we really don't know because of that injury.

I'm sorry, but a few plays or not you don't start Palko over Orton.

Hey Stanzi had to know the playbook by then.

[NOLA]

Chi-town_Chief, on 27 January 2012 - 03:56 PM, said:

I'm sorry, but a few plays or not you don't start Palko over Orton.

Hey Stanzi had to know the playbook by then.

I'm sorry, but I thought Stanzi made Palko look like William the Conquerer during preseason. I don't think I ever want that kid to see the field.

[The_Jonas]

NOLA, on 27 January 2012 - 04:17 PM, said:

I'm sorry, but I thought Stanzi made Palko look like William the Conquerer during preseason. I don't think I ever want that kid to see the field.

You really thought Palko looked better?

I didn't think it was even remotely close. Stanzi played almost exclusively with the #3 group, and our #3 group was f**king terrible. We couldn't even run plays because every play was broken within a second of the snap. Makes it hard to really evaluate his performance. When Stanzi was with the 2's he made some nice throws (I think it was against the Rams). Palko, even when he was statistically good, looked awful and he played almost exclusively with the 1's and 2's.. The guy threw 2 TD's on out routes that he launched while fading away. Both balls hung for a freaking eternity, and normally would have been easy pick 6's. He got lucky. He tried that shit again during the season against real players and it went back the other way for six.

Palko's best attribute is seemingly dumb luck. He did it again with that hail mary.

If I had to choose, I'd take Stanzi based on what I don't know. Nobody is worse than Palko. It's not feasible. He doesn't do ANYTHING well.

[Chi-town_Chief]

The_Jonas, on 27 January 2012 - 04:35 PM, said:

You really thought Palko looked better?

I didn't think it was even remotely close. Stanzi played almost exclusively with the #3 group, and our #3 group was f**king terrible. We couldn't even run plays because every play was broken within a second of the snap. Makes it hard to really evaluate his performance. When Stanzi was with the 2's he made some nice throws (I think it was against the Rams). Palko, even when he was statistically good, looked awful and he played almost exclusively with the 1's and 2's.. The guy threw 2 TD's on out routes that he launched while fading away. Both balls hung for a freaking eternity, and normally would have been easy pick 6's. He got lucky. He tried that shit again during the season against real players and it went back the other way for six.

Palko's best attribute is seemingly dumb luck. He did it again with that hail mary.

If I had to choose, I'd take Stanzi based on what I don't know. Nobody is worse than Palko. It's not feasible. He doesn't do ANYTHING well.

Exactly. At least we knew what we had with palko and that was nothing. We could have put stanzi in and if he was actually worse at least we would know he wasn't out QOTF