AssKickingBoots, on 05 August 2011 - 11:31 AM, said:
Not that Greg Wesley was some sort of mystical beast in the defensive backfield, but this is absolutely right. Other than a little bit of hitting power (G-Wes could hit with power too), Pollard was worse in every facet of his game, largely because he was always headhunting. I was hopeful at the time because Pollard did have some talent, but there's no doubt that Wesley was better.
Yeah man. Wesley blew coverages all the g-damn time... especially on play action. He bit hard on play action.
Pollard simply sucks at angles. You know some Safeties aren't that fast, but they take great angles and that allows them to get by. Pollard took some of the worst angles I've ever seen. He was usually WAY out in front and the ball carrier would just do a hesitation move of some kind and he'd just go flying right by.
The most tackles I've seen him miss is eight.
I'm pissed if my TEAM misses eight tackles!
nathanKent, on 04 August 2011 - 08:47 PM, said:
add for Pats fans who LIBE in la la land....
wow.
Just the mention of that troll's name makes me want to punch kittens.