<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; NFL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/category/nfl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Brett Favre Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/09/the-brett-favre-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/09/the-brett-favre-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three weeks ago I ended my article The Ell Roberson Effect with the line &#8220;who wants to talk about Brett Favre?&#8221;. Well&#8230;. who wants to talk about Brett Favre? Well, I do, and I&#8217;m the one with the magic electronic pen that makes words appear on the front page of the website, so we&#8217;re going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three weeks ago I ended my article The Ell Roberson Effect with the line &#8220;who wants to talk about Brett Favre?&#8221;. Well&#8230;. who wants to talk about Brett Favre? Well, I do, and I&#8217;m the one with the magic electronic pen that makes words appear on the front page of the website, so we&#8217;re going to talk about Brett Favre.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m about to take a very unpopular stance: Brett Favre may be the best thing in professional football right now. He&#8217;s a flawed but redemptive hero&#8211;a guy who acknowledges and atones for his failings, both as a player and as a human being. He&#8217;s a good front face for the company too&#8211;he&#8217;ll do everything from commercials to cameos in R-rated comedies to locker room renditions of week one American Idol tunes. To top it off, he&#8217;s still one of the sport&#8217;s best athletes&#8211;entering his 20th season, he&#8217;s a legitimate Pro Bowl candidate, and, in the eyes of his teammates, he&#8217;s still the missing link that can take a team from a playoff berth to a Super Bowl appearance.<span id="more-344"></span></p>
<p>Why, then, is his presence such a divisive element? Why is he so persistently derided by fans and press alike? The answer is simple: he&#8217;s not playing for your team.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it: Vikings fans don&#8217;t dislike the guy. He spent the overwhelming majority of his career playing for their closest division rival, geographically speaking, but he still has their support. At most, they&#8217;re vaguely frustrated with him for his indecisiveness, but you won&#8217;t see even a significant minority calling for him to retire or be cut. That&#8217;s because they reviewed their options, and they didn&#8217;t find an Aaron Rodgers waiting in the wings. They found a questionable career backup and a Kyle Boller impersonator. Based on that, they decided they liked the future Hall of Famer with the rocket arm a little better.</p>
<p>If he was on your team, so would you.</p>
<p>If he was on my team, so would I. I scanned through the Chiefs&#8217; roster earlier today. If, for some bizarre reason, Kansas City was a legitimate contender, and, if for some bizarre reason, Minnesota elected to cosmically repay Kansas City for giftwrapping them a future Hall of Famer two offseasons ago by trading another future Hall of Famer to play out the remainder of his career in Arrowhead, there are a grand total of three players whom I would not trade to make that deal happen: Brandon Flowers, Eric Berry, and Jamaal Charles.</p>
<p>The Vikings, by contrast, gave up nothing more than a few million extra dollars to entice him out of retirement. As with nearly everything else he does, Favre has been criticized for demanding more money, but the additional money still places his salary below those of many of his peers (Peyton Manning, for instance). Whether or not to seize the opportunity to hire a top 10 signal caller at or below market value isn&#8217;t really much of a question at all.</p>
<p>Every season I pick an NFC team to support alongside the Chiefs. I never choose the Cowboys for familial reasons, and I never choose the Rams because I don&#8217;t care much for the city of St. Louis. In recent years it has been the Giants, due in large part to my appreciation of Kareem McKenzie, whom I consider to be one of the most underrated players in the league. It&#8217;s been obvious, however, for the past few years that it&#8217;s time to pick a different pony. Kareem&#8217;s career is winding down, the front office is slowly dismantling the Super Bowl team of a few years ago, and I really don&#8217;t care about Eli Manning.</p>
<p>I like football games that are won in the trenches. Accordingly, guys like Steve Hutchinson and the Williams twins have made Minnesota a likable team for me for a while now. Jared Allen and a brief appearance by Tony Richardson didn&#8217;t hurt either. The NFL doesn&#8217;t thrive on fans like me though. They, as a business, thrive on the casual fan, and the average casual fan doesn&#8217;t care about the game in the trenches. The average casual fan won&#8217;t seek out a Pat Williams jersey. They&#8217;ll look for the skill position player whose story they like best. It&#8217;s hard to get excited about a team led by Tarvaris Jackson. Brett Favre? Easy. He&#8217;s the redemptive hero, engaged in battle with a former boss and a well-liked understudy. He&#8217;s the guy who helps us forget about the harsher realities of the game: steroid abuse, sexual deviancy, and an impending lockout that looks more and more likely every day.</p>
<p>And the guy can still play.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a great story in an era that needs exactly that. Brett, unless my Chiefs are contenders, I hope you win it all. Here&#8217;s to a happy ending.</p>
<p>(And yes, I really am holding a beer right now.)</p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5733-the-brett-favre-effect/">Home Of The Chiefs forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/09/the-brett-favre-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preseason Evaluation: Game 4 and The Right 53</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/09/preseason-evaluation-game-4-and-the-right-53/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/09/preseason-evaluation-game-4-and-the-right-53/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year, it never fails. I always end up watching at least one preseason game on tape delay. My two poor, beleaguered VCRs are challenged with the task of making sure I don&#8217;t miss the action. I trust neither of them, however, so I always end up with two copies of any game I miss. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, it never fails. I always end up watching at least one preseason game on tape delay. My two poor, beleaguered VCRs are challenged with the task of making sure I don&#8217;t miss the action. I trust neither of them, however, so I always end up with two copies of any game I miss.</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s correct. I am the proud possessor of not one, but two copies of the Green Bay Squeakby. What will become of them? They&#8217;ll probably be recycled to catch bits and pieces of regular season games. Even though it was a victory, and victories have been few and far between over the past few seasons, I don&#8217;t see any pressing reason to relive this one after I&#8217;m finished re-watching it tonight.<span id="more-341"></span></p>
<p>The nice thing about watching the final preseason game post-roster cuts is that I get to see some of the team&#8217;s lesser players playing their last few downs in the red and gold&#8211;players like Nuke Ndukwe, for instance. The less than nice thing is that I also get to see some of the team&#8217;s lesser players struggling, with the knowledge that ultimately they haven&#8217;t played their final downs in the red and gold&#8211;players like Ryan O&#8217;Callaghan, for instance. No team has 53 superstars, but it&#8217;s tough to deny that the guys holding up the bottom of the heap in Kansas City are worse than most team&#8217;s worst&#8211;players like Terrance Copper, for instance.</p>
<p>(In fairness to Nuke, I should state that I had every intention of not liking him when he showed up, strictly on account of the fact that he replaced Herb Taylor. I should extend him a special thanks, however, for making it easy to follow through.)</p>
<p>On to the game.</p>
<p>First things first: it&#8217;s nice to see the Chiefs begin to establish an identity on both sides of the ball (for the purpose of this discussion, epic failure doesn&#8217;t qualify as an identity.) My tenure as a Chiefs fan began at the beginning of the Marty era, during which the team established a strong identity on defense. During the Vermeil era, the team lost what little remained of its defensive identity, but gained a respectable identity on offense. In each case, the identities were rooted less around a style of play and more around a single player&#8211;Derrick Thomas first, then Will Shields. My invocation of the latter will likely raise a few eyebrows, as the more obvious answer would be Priest Holmes. Remember, however, that Derrick Blaylock had four touchdowns in a single game (three behind Brian Waters because the Atlanta defense skewed so heavily toward Shields&#8217;s side).</p>
<p>Identity is harder to create without players of Thomas&#8217;s and Shields&#8217;s caliber. In my 20+ years of watching the Chiefs, only Chan Gailey, working with a very green Tyler Thigpen, was able to create some semblance of it. I watched Mike Solari, Todd Haley, Greg Robinson, Gunther Cunningham, and Clancy Pendergast all fail to do it as coordinators (Haley the head coach may still prove the ability to do so, but as a playcaller, he stunk). That&#8217;s why I like what I see when I look at what the team is beginning to accomplish right now. Charlie Weis and Romeo Crennel don&#8217;t have Derrick Thomases and Will Shieldses to work with, but, just as they did in New England, they&#8217;re creating identity with the players they have.</p>
<p>In the case of Crennel, the identity is not much different from that which he created in Foxboro. The front seven thrives on physicality and versatility, and they gamble like crazy. Frequently during the Green Bay game, with the safeties playing deep, the linebackers left large sections of field completely unprotected. On some plays it works better than others, but Crennel and his players accept the fact that they&#8217;ll periodically get burned. In exchange, however, they&#8217;ll strike a little fear in the hearts of opposing quarterbacks by constantly playing on the offense&#8217;s side of the line of scrimmage. This requires a sturdy pass rush. The Chiefs have sorely lacked one for two seasons now. Crennel has thus far created this pressure primarily with four players: Tamba Hali, Andy Studebaker, Wallace Gilberry, and, most surprisingly, Demorrio Williams, all of whom were available to both of Crennel&#8217;s predecessors. To some extent the players may be playing harder for him out of respect for who he is and what he has accomplished, but the reality is just that Crennel understands better how to utilize the talent he has. Case in point: Williams in a three-point stance. This was, in essence, Crennel teaching an old dog a new trick.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what a coordinator is supposed to do. Why it&#8217;s taken Kansas City so long to find a new one is beyond me, but I sure am glad they finally did. Not feeling compelled to wince on every down will, to the average fan, be considered a major improvement over what they&#8217;ve witnessed for the past decade.</p>
<p>In Weis&#8217;s case, the option of simply recapping his M.O. from his Foxboro days isn&#8217;t an option. He doesn&#8217;t have a Tom Brady or Drew Bledsoe to work with. Likewise, he didn&#8217;t have a Jamaal Charles or a Thomas Jones to work with in New England. I&#8217;m not entirely convinced he even had a Jackie Battle. No, this script is a complete rewrite, and aside from having Pro Bowl centers and left guards on both teams, there are virtually no similarities. The closest thing on Weis&#8217;s resume to what he&#8217;s working with now was his first season as a coordinator with the Jets, with Neil O&#8217;Donnell as his signal caller and former return specialist Adrian Murrell as his feature back. Murrell had hit the wall by 1997, however, so even there a valid comparison can&#8217;t really be made.</p>
<p>Weis, who has never had a losing season as an NFL coordinator, is probably working with the least talented squad of his career. Still, his starters posted 14 points against a defense generally regarded as one of the best in the league. That, to me, indicates that he&#8217;s making progress. The fact that guys like Jackie Battle, Dexter McCluster, and even Tim Castille are coming to life and having some of the best games of their young careers also indicates to me that he&#8217;s making progress. Given that he&#8217;s working for the first time with a quarterback that will not ever see a Pro Bowl roster (I&#8217;d love to eat my words on this point, but I know what I see&#8230;. dude just isn&#8217;t very good), progress over last season is really all I could fairly expect.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re getting a little more than that, though. I&#8217;ve been a temporary Giants fan for the past few seasons (I always pick an NFC team to follow and support, but I seldom stick to them for more than two or three years). One of my favorite aspects of watching the Giants, particularly during their Super Bowl season, was seeing the three-headed running attack of Brandon Jacobs, Derrick Ward, and Ahmad Bradshaw. Jacobs and Ward split the majority of carries through the first three quarters, then in the fourth Bradshaw provided a fresh set of legs. Given that two of Kansas City&#8217;s three running backs have yet to play a full game, it&#8217;s tough to say exactly how Weis will implement the three-headed running attack this season, but my guess is that it won&#8217;t be far off from New York&#8217;s. Factor in Charles&#8217;s soft hands as well as the multifaceted contributions McCluster is likely to bring to the table, and suddenly this is something very different from what one would expect from a run-first offense.</p>
<p>Okay, so you didn&#8217;t get much of a game review there, but hey&#8230;. it was preseason. Week four preseason. It&#8217;s as close to meaningless as football can be (which is, to say, not very meaningless at all).</p>
<p>Lastly, on the subject of Todd Haley&#8217;s Right 53, I gotta say&#8230;. I&#8217;m almost impressed. I saw only two glaring errors: the omission of Derek Lokey and the trade of Jarrad Page. When I saw Lokey in a goal line package at fullback, I assumed it was a test of his versatility to determine whether or not he could be used as a change of pace during the regular season. I think I was wrong. I think it was a last-ditch effort to impress an otherwise unimpressed coaching staff. Regardless of their impression of him as a lineman, I see a critical failure on the part of the coaching staff in cutting him. He should have been giftwrapped Thomas Gafford&#8217;s job, which, if nothing else, would have left him available as an injury substitute at both nose tackle and fullback. I know I&#8217;m outspoken on the whole dedicated long snapper issue, but I&#8217;m right. Gafford can&#8217;t contribute elsewhere. Lokey, just like Jay Alford during his tenure in New York, had something more to offer.</p>
<p>With Page, ultimately I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a wrong move to keep him off the field in Kansas City. The wrong move, rather, was in allowing yet another Chief to dictate his place on the team by simply stating that he didn&#8217;t want to play for the organization anymore. Eddie Kennison aside, I don&#8217;t believe in allowing players to strongarm the front office. The team struggles enough in free agency to attract players strictly on the grounds of geography. It sends the wrong message to the rest of the locker room when players are essentially allowed to leave on request (see also: Larry Johnson, though I had a much harder time convincing myself to be legitimately upset about that one).</p>
<p>End rant. End preseason. Clever titles return next week. Fire Tyler Palko.</p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5732-preseason-evaluation-game-4-and-the-right-53/">Home Of The Chiefs forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/09/preseason-evaluation-game-4-and-the-right-53/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preseason Evaluation: Game 3</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/332/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/332/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To begin, I want to touch on something I touched on briefly in a mid-week article last season. Football players are on performance-enhancing drugs. Let&#8217;s not kid ourselves into believing the NFL&#8217;s testing policy works. The average playing weight at most positions has increased 30-50 pounds in the last three decades. A large part of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To begin, I want to touch on something I touched on briefly in <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2009/11/the-panic-in-needle-park/">a mid-week article last season.</a> Football players are on performance-enhancing drugs. Let&#8217;s not kid ourselves into believing the NFL&#8217;s testing policy works. The average playing weight at most positions has increased 30-50 pounds in the last three decades. A large part of that is the result of advancements in sports nutrition and physical training, but it&#8217;s also because players are on performance-enhancing drugs. When talking about concussions, we talk about changing the rules and designing better helmets, but we skirt around the major factor at play: these guys are really big, and getting hit by someone large is more painful than getting hit by someone small. This might not have been a major factor in Cameron Sheffield&#8217;s or Maurice Leggett&#8217;s injuries, as in both cases the collision was with a running back of similar size, but it&#8217;s a subject that definitely warrants much more open dialogue than is presently exchanged.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to hear from my readers whether they think the defense&#8217;s success says more about Kansas City or more about Philadelphia. I myself am at a loss. I see few, if any, parallels between last night&#8217;s game and the game six days prior. Did the unit turn the corner sometime last week, or is Tampa Bay with their backup quarterback a more formidable offense than Philadelphia with their starter? I hope it&#8217;s the former, but I&#8217;m far from convinced.<span id="more-332"></span></p>
<p>I am convinced, on the other hand, that this game alone was enough to determine the right 53. In large part, the players anticipated to deliver delivered, and the ones anticipated to disappoint disappointed. It makes for a tidy trimming over the coming week and a half. Thus, based on last night&#8217;s performance, I think it&#8217;s time for me to unleash my first depth chart of the preseason upon my readership. Position by position, here&#8217;s what I saw happen:</p>
<p><strong>RUNNING BACK</strong><br />
There isn&#8217;t much comparison to be made between Thomas Jones and Jamaal Charles. The team&#8217;s official depth chart lists Jones at the starter, and Jones has played at least the first snap of every game thus far, but Todd Haley knows where his bread is buttered. Jones is unquestionably a capable tailback. I&#8217;m glad he&#8217;s on my team. He&#8217;s not special. Charles is. Charles has nearly twice the combined rushing and receiving yardage as Jones, and he&#8217;s accomplished this feat with fewer touches. Haley may want to send his younger player a message about focus and accountability right now, but I doubt he&#8217;s foolish enough to risk losing a game over it during the regular season.</p>
<p>Jackie Battle, meanwhile, is delivering on the promise I felt he had last season. In the storm chasing world, Battle would be branded a core puncher. He&#8217;s also a major special teams contributor. No player on the bubble has staked their claim quite the way Battle has. I don&#8217;t think Kestahn Moore stands a chance.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Jamaal Charles, Thomas Jones, Jackie Battle.</p>
<p><strong>QUARTERBACK</strong><br />
While Charles, Jones, and Battle are invoking memories of Holmes, Richardson, and Blaylock, albeit with a different panache, Matt Cassel and Tyler Palko are busy invoking memories of some of Trent Green&#8217;s backups. And I don&#8217;t mean Todd Collins. Cassel looks every bit the dink and dunk short yardage quarterback Damon Huard was, and Palko looks every bit as lost as Jonathan Quinn. Brodie Croyle is doing a good impression of one of Green&#8217;s backups too: Brodie Croyle. As per usual, he&#8217;s camping out on the injury report.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Jeff Garcia is playing in the UFL. Garcia isn&#8217;t on Todd Haley&#8217;s radar. He isn&#8217;t on anybody&#8217;s radar. I&#8217;ll guarantee you, however, that he damn sure could outplay Tyler Palko. Maybe Matt Cassel too.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Matt Cassel, Brodie Croyle, somebody other than Tyler Palko.</p>
<p><strong>WIDE RECEIVER</strong><br />
The assertion was made during the Eddie Kennison era that the Chiefs didn&#8217;t really have a #1 wide receiver. They were right. Eddie was a strong #2 who became the go-to guy because the Chiefs never, ever invest in wide receivers. Not much has changed. Neither Dwayne Bowe nor Chris Chambers is a true #1, and Dexter McCluster, given his weight, can&#8217;t fairly be expected to be an every down player. I have no real desire to talk about what&#8217;s going on behind those three either. Between Cassel and this group of bruisers, all I can say is this: I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;ve got good running backs.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Dwayne Bowe, Chris Chambers, Dexter McCluster, Jeremy Horne, Lance Long, Quinten Lawrence.<br />
<strong><br />
TIGHT END</strong><br />
Here again is a position where a #1 player is not present. Leonard Pope is exactly the type of tight end I&#8217;d like my team to have as a #3 guy. He&#8217;s the best of the bunch. Tony Gonzalez, you are missed. Tony Moeaki, you are not Tony Gonzalez. Jake O&#8217;Connell, you&#8217;re not even Billy Baber.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Leonard Pope, Tony Moeaki, Jake O&#8217;Connell.</p>
<p><strong>FULLBACK</strong><br />
How about Derek Lokey? A lot of people probably haven&#8217;t caught on yet to the fact that he&#8217;s the short yardage fullback, and he&#8217;s not bad at it at all. It&#8217;s interesting watching him thread the gap between Rudy Niswanger and Ryan Lilja, both of whom he (allegedly) outweighs. Oh, and Mike Cox and Tim Castille aren&#8217;t bad either.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Tim Castille, Mike Cox, with Derek Lokey ahead of either if it&#8217;s 3rd and 2.</p>
<p><strong>CENTER</strong><br />
Rudy had a good game. He made a couple of key reads and laid some hard hits on Philly&#8217;s linemen. He&#8217;s still not of the same stock as Casey Wiegmann. This contest should long since have been over. Still, it&#8217;s good to have two viable options. It has been brought to my attention also that there is a third center on the roster right now: Lemuel Jeanpierre. I accepted an overwhelmingly French name when Jean Philippe Darche replaced longtime long snapper Kendall Gammon a few years back. I&#8217;m not quite ready to do it again. Also, in order to make the team, he would probably have needed to make it to the field once or twice during preseason. This is the easiest game of odd-man-out ever.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Casey Wiegmann, Rudy Niswanger.</p>
<p><strong>OFFENSIVE GUARD</strong><br />
After the struggles of the last few years, the team looks surprisingly well-set at guard, at least for the time being. Brian Waters has had a good preseason, as has Ryan Lilja. Better yet, Jon Asamoah could potentially be special. Perhaps it&#8217;s just wishful thinking taking hold, but on two plays I saw him make plays downfield that reminded me of Will Shields. As much as I like Lilja, and as happy as I am to see him back where he belongs, I won&#8217;t be surprised if he loses his job midseason, and I won&#8217;t be disappointed either.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Brian Waters (LG), Ryan Lilja (RG/replacement LG if Waters is injured), Jon Asamoah (RG). Given that Rudy has played a little bit of guard in practice, I don&#8217;t anticipate the team keeps a fourth.</p>
<p><strong>OFFENSIVE TACKLE</strong><br />
Barry Richardson, in my opinion, proved that he deserves the starting right tackle job last night. Cassel, master of the slow draw, was getting the sort of pass protection he would need to be successful if he were going to be successful. On many downs he had in excess of four seconds to get rid of the ball. That means either the Philadelphia pass rush, ranked 3rd in sacks last season, is weaker than Atlanta&#8217;s or Tampa Bay&#8217;s, or Barry Richardson is a superior athlete to Ryan O&#8217;Callaghan.</p>
<p>Branden Albert, meanwhile, continues to underwhelm me. He plays well, but he doesn&#8217;t play well enough to justify what we gave to get him. He did as a rookie, however, at 20 pounds heavier than his present weight. I know I&#8217;m a broken record on this subject, but some guys just play better bigger. Get that man a season pass to Sizzler and give him a chance to return to form.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Branden Albert (LT), Barry Richardson (RT/LT replacement if Albert is injured), Colin Brown (RT/RG), Ryan O&#8217;Callaghan (RT).</p>
<p><strong>NOSE TACKLE</strong><br />
There is no greater weakness on this team.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Ron Edwards, Derek Lokey.</p>
<p><strong>DEFENSIVE END</strong><br />
Alex Magee apparently finally woke up to the fact that his job is in jeopardy and started making plays. Too bad he&#8217;s logjammed behind three guys that will make it on the quality of their play and one guy whose paycheck dictates that he&#8217;s not going anywhere anytime soon.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Glenn Dorsey (RDE), Shaun Smith (LDE), Wallace Gilberry, I can&#8217;t bring myself to say the fourth name because I don&#8217;t think he belongs in an NFL jersey, and Alex Magee.</p>
<p><strong>INSIDE LINEBACKER</strong><br />
Given that Andy Studebaker established himself as the starter at the Sam position last night, it&#8217;s not a bad idea to move Mike Vrabel to the position of his namesake. He started a year and a half at left inside &#8216;backer for New England, and he&#8217;s better than the alternatives. As for the other starting spot, a strong argument can&#8217;t be made for any of the four candidates. Therefore, it is with great reservation and borderline disdain that I present to you the winner of the coveted nathanKent depth chart right inside linebacker starting spot: Demorrio Williams. Williams is the least athletic but most consistent, and he appears to be the best ballhawk of the bunch&#8211;those two sacks did a little bit to impress me with a guy who has underwhelmed me for years now. As for the backups&#8230;. who cares? It&#8217;s not a position of strength.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Mike Vrabel (LILB), Demorrio Williams (RILB), Derrick Johnson, Corey Mays.</p>
<p><strong>OUTSIDE LINEBACKER</strong><br />
Note that, as of right now, Tamba Hali is not credited with any sacks for the season. Left tackles have learned their lesson with him&#8211;hold and hope you don&#8217;t get caught. He isn&#8217;t elite. He might never make it to a Pro Bowl. At this point, his biggest asset isn&#8217;t his strength or his speed. It&#8217;s Andy Studebaker, and Andy Studebaker&#8217;s biggest asset is Tamba Hali. Just as it was with Hali and Jared Allen, there&#8217;s a renewed sense for opposing offenses of picking their poison. As for the backups, even if he hadn&#8217;t played well, Cameron Sheffield would likely earn a sympathy spot on anybody&#8217;s depth chart today. In my opinion, sympathy isn&#8217;t required. The kid plays hard. Beyond that, there&#8217;s another Frenchman and a guy whose name I&#8217;ve only heard in passing. Okay, Pierre Walters isn&#8217;t French, but neither is Lemuel Jeanpierre. Hey, I didn&#8217;t say everything on here was fair.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Andy Studebaker (LOLB), Tamba Hali (ROLB), Cameron Sheffield, John Russell.</p>
<p><strong>CORNERBACK</strong><br />
Kevin Kolb played too poorly to properly evaluate much of anything the Kansas City cornerbacks did. Brandon Carr has a bit of a niche for CB blitzes. There&#8217;s not really a whole lot else to say&#8230;. they did their jobs. What else could anybody possibly ask for?</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Brandon Flowers (LCB), Brandon Carr (RCB), Maurice Leggett (NB), Mike Richardson, Javier Arenas, Travis Daniels.</p>
<p><strong>SAFETY</strong><br />
Again, not much to say here either, aside from the fact that Kansas City will clearly be starting two rookies. Kendrick Lewis has been a very pleasant surprise.</p>
<p>BATTING ORDER: Eric Berry, Kendrick Lewis, Jon McGraw, Jarrad Page. I&#8217;m still holding out hope, because the other options are really bad. Donald Washington is terrible.<br />
<strong><br />
SPECIAL TEAMS</strong><br />
We all know what&#8217;s happening here. They have at least two solid kick returners, a great kicker, a great punter, and a long snapper that will, as most long snappers do, waste a roster spot. I guess Derek Lokey is already busy enough with three positions though, so maybe it&#8217;s for the best.</p>
<p>If this game is any indication&#8211;and I believe it is&#8211;this team will not score a lot of points. The offense lacks playmakers. At best, we should anticipate seeing nothing more than Martyball scores, which means that in order to be competitive, the defense must be on point. They looked on point more often than not yesterday, but&#8230;. I don&#8217;t trust it. Four days ago I threw my support behind Kevin Kolb and the Eagles in a divisional pickem contest. Having seen him/them play a full game, I feel I was errant in my selection. Holding a subpar team&#8217;s starters to 10 points isn&#8217;t a major accomplishment. It should be considered a basic requirement.</p>
<p>On the other hand, maybe I was right, and I just severely underestimated Romeo Crennel. That&#8217;s a pleasant thought, but I&#8217;m not staking any money on it. This team is still a year or two away from contention.</p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5679-preseason-evaluation-game-3/">Home Of The Chiefs Forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/332/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preseason Evaluation: Game 2</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/preseason-evaluation-game-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/preseason-evaluation-game-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet again I&#8217;m dispensing with the cute titles and semi-obscure musical references. They&#8217;ll return with the regular season. For now, I&#8217;m just gonna talk football. The second preseason game is my favorite of the four. The starters play the full first half, which means it looks something a bit like a regular season game. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again I&#8217;m dispensing with the cute titles and semi-obscure musical references. They&#8217;ll return with the regular season. For now, I&#8217;m just gonna talk football. The second preseason game is my favorite of the four. The starters play the full first half, which means it looks something a bit like a regular season game. In the second half, the scrubs get probably their best chance to audition for the coaches. Thus, there are really two separate games taking place. Accordingly, I&#8217;ll evaluate each half individually.</p>
<p><strong>FIRST HALF</strong></p>
<p>I have no choice but to admit this&#8211;Matt Cassel had an okay game. Whereas his passes generally range from questionable to bad, tonight they ranged from good to questionable. He kept the ball in the hands of his receivers and out of the hands of the Buccs&#8217; defense. He amassed two successful scoring drives. Better yet, he improved dramatically on last week&#8217;s paltry average of four yards per completion. This is undoubtedly partly attributable to improved playcalling from the sideline. Charlie Weis might not be much of a college head coach, but it&#8217;s hard to deny that he has a bit of a Midas touch with an NFL offense.<span id="more-328"></span></p>
<p>Still, the major change between this week and last was not the plays, but rather the time allotted to execute them. With much maligned center Rudy Niswanger displaced from the starting lineup by his old boss, Casey Wiegmann, Cassel simply had longer on each down to get the job done. Cassel isn&#8217;t known for a speedy release, so that extra half second or longer afforded to him by having a stronger snapper might on any given play make the difference between success and failure. I&#8217;ve said this before, and I&#8217;ll stick by my analysis&#8211;Rudy is not a bad player. He&#8217;s just not built to play center. He has too long of an upper body, which keeps him from getting down low enough, which keeps him from getting proper leverage. Consequently, while he doesn&#8217;t allow a lot of sacks, he also doesn&#8217;t contribute much of anything past that first stop. Casey, by contrast, gets great leverage even against much larger players, and he consistently gets to the second level. And unlike a lot of other centers, Rudy included, he knows what to do once he gets there.</p>
<p>Et cetera, et cetera&#8230;. My longtime readers already know my outspoken admiration of Casey&#8217;s play. For those of you who were happy to see him go in 2008, however, I implore you&#8230;. tell me I&#8217;m wrong. After tonight, try to state your case for putting another player (short of maybe Dan Koppen or Jeff Saturday) in Casey&#8217;s place. After watching Mike Goff fall from grace so dramatically and so quickly last season, I&#8217;m leery of aging offensive linemen, but I&#8217;ve got a lot of confidence in Casey. He may not be the future of the franchise, but he&#8217;s more than enough for right now.</p>
<p>Sadly, the veteran running back also brought in this offseason isn&#8217;t having the same spectacular start as Casey. Thomas Jones continues to underwhelm me. Jamaal Charles and Jackie Battle were the only two Chiefs who have run worth a damn at all this preseason. Luckily for us, both of them are running at or above their anticipated potential. Charles was incorrectly identified as a speed guy earlier in his career (the error is glaring when evaluating him alongside Dexter McCluster). He has speed, but he also has vision, power, and great hands. He&#8217;s one of the best I&#8217;ve seen since Marshall Faulk, and, barring injury, there is no conceivable reason why this year won&#8217;t be the first of many Pro Bowl berths for him.</p>
<p>Dwayne Bowe, by contrast, won&#8217;t be going to a Pro Bowl anytime soon, if ever. Chris Chambers probably won&#8217;t be going back to another one. This is a pedestrian receiver corps, and, unlike some of Kansas City&#8217;s pedestrian receiver corps past, they don&#8217;t have a Pro Bowl tight end propping them up. Having said that, I&#8217;ll settle this year for consistency. If the Chiefs can keep the same top three (Chambers, Bowe, and probably McCluster) for all or most of the season, I&#8217;ll call that progress.</p>
<p>Progress, defensively speaking, is hard to analyze from this game. Tampa Bay isn&#8217;t known for their potent offense. The front seven looked better tonight than last week, but then again, what front seven wouldn&#8217;t? Johnson/Belcher seems to me to be a better duo than Williams/Mays, but give credit to Demorrio for playing with the fire and anger that any demoted starter should. The backfield looks solid. I like Kendrick Lewis. No team wants to start rookies at both safety positions, but, barring the unlikely return of Jarrad Page, there&#8217;s little question that he&#8217;s the second best safety on the team, and probably the third best defensive back overall. I errantly believed Flowers, Pollard, and Page to be 3/4ths of the next potentially great Kansas City backfield. Now I think it could be Flowers, Berry, and Lewis, and based on what I&#8217;ve seen so far, I think I might be glad I was wrong the first time around.</p>
<p>Beyond that, I don&#8217;t know what else to say about the defense. Get back to me next week after they&#8217;ve played another real offense.</p>
<p>The real star of the first half, however, was, just as was last week, Javier Arenas. By himself he&#8217;s capable of making serious plays, but he&#8217;s doing something far more significant&#8211;he&#8217;s inspiring his teammates. They&#8217;re better blockers this week than they were last, and better by far last week than they were last year. It&#8217;s the same players as last year too, minus Jon McGraw, their captain, so ostensibly this should be a less organized, less skilled group, but it&#8217;s not. Some of that is coaching, and some of it is cohesion too, but a lot of it is inspiration. There&#8217;s a reason it was Arenas, not Berry or McCluster, that got taped to a goalpost. It&#8217;s hazing, but it&#8217;s also a sign of respect.</p>
<p>Moving on now&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>SECOND HALF</strong></p>
<p>Tyler Palko sucked.</p>
<p>Thank you, and goodnight. </p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5642-nks-preseason-game-2-evaluation/">Home Of The Chiefs forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/preseason-evaluation-game-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preseason Evaluation: Game 1</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/preseason-evaluation-game-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/preseason-evaluation-game-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folks, there&#8217;s no clever title this time around. No clever introduction either. I&#8217;m going straight to analysis. If I had to sum up the Chiefs&#8217; performance on Friday in a single sentence, that sentence would be this: what happened in the middle of that starting defensive line was a travesty. I could leave it at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, there&#8217;s no clever title this time around. No clever introduction either. I&#8217;m going straight to analysis.</p>
<p>If I had to sum up the Chiefs&#8217; performance on Friday in a single sentence, that sentence would be this: what happened in the middle of that starting defensive line was a travesty. I could leave it at that and feel satisfied with the quality of my article. After all, it&#8217;s not the size of the ship, right? That wouldn&#8217;t be fair to Javier Arenas, however, so I&#8217;ll write a little more.<span id="more-321"></span></p>
<p>On the subject of size, ya know where size matters? Defensive tackle. Ron Edwards, who looks fatter than ever (which doesn&#8217;t jive with Haley&#8217;s workout philosophy, right?), isn&#8217;t big enough to have a Ted Washington-type career in his mid thirties. His already limited athleticism is grinding to a halt too. In order for a 3-4 to work, the nose tackle must draw a double team. Edwards needs only one to be contained. I think at times he needs none.</p>
<p>Many of you will object to the idea of me calling out Edwards, given that I supported him last year. Well&#8230;. last year he was drawing double teams. I liked Mike Goff for a long time too, but when a guy slips in mobility the way both of those guys have, I feel completely justified in withdrawing my support.</p>
<p>Also on the subject of size, ya know where size matters? Defensive end. Derek Lokey, mercifully, is no longer being auditioned in any meaningful capacity at nose tackle, but even after packing on 15 pounds (again, weren&#8217;t the players supposed to do the opposite?) and sliding over a spot, he still looks small. Having said that, I like the guy. He&#8217;s scrappy. He reminds me a little of Gary Stills. And he knows how to long snap. I&#8217;m very outspoken about my dislike of teams dedicating a gameday roster spot to a dedicated long snapper, unless that guy is Kendall Gammon or that &#8216;roid head from Houston. Thomas Gafford is neither of those two. Give Lokey Gafford&#8217;s job, and let him hit a few guys too while he&#8217;s out there. Jay Alford is doing it in New York, and he sacked Tom Brady in the Super Bowl.</p>
<p>On the subject of length, ya know whose arms are long enough to make up for his stature? Glenn Dorsey. Dorsey and Tamba Hali were the only two defenders consistently in the Atlanta backfield. The discussion about whether or not the two of them could play their new positions is officially over. Dorsey may never tally sacks like Warren Sapp, which is what was expected of him coming out of college, but he&#8217;s doing a damn fine job of playing his part.</p>
<p>Ya know who isn&#8217;t doing such a damn fine job of playing his part? Demorrio Williams. I know we&#8217;re thin at the position, but is it really necessary to continue trotting him out there as a starter? The rest of the inside linebackers, Corey Mays included, are outplaying him by a wide margin. Defensive coordinator Romeo Crennel has used Mike Vrabel as an inside &#8216;backer before. Maybe it&#8217;s time for the old man to reprise that role, particularly given the fact that he too is being outplayed by his backup.</p>
<p>Also on the subject of being outplayed by his backup, there&#8217;s Rudy Niswanger. In his defense, Rudy actually didn&#8217;t play badly. He just got outplayed by the old man from Parkersburg, Iowa. The old man is not as out of form as the average Denver fan would have you think. I&#8217;m an offensive line guy, and I liked Casey quite a bit when he was here the first time. It would be natural, based on that, for me to allow subjectivity to take over and shade my perception. If you believe it has, go re-watch the second quarter. Watch Casey beat his man on the line and get to the second level, just like he used to. Is he everything he was in 2002? Of course not, but keep in mind that the only other player from the fabled five (really seven, as both John Welbourn and Marcus Spears deserve respect for their contributions) is still playing: Brian Waters. Both Waters and Wiegmann are only a season removed from earned Pro Bowl appearances (I stress the word earned, because neither of the two is going to win a popularity contest outside the AFC West).</p>
<p>Then again, as long as you&#8217;re putting Wiegmann in a line with Ryan O&#8217;Callaghan, it&#8217;s not gonna do a bit of good for the Pride of Parkersburg to play to his potential. Matt Cassel, who has frequently demonstrated that he&#8217;s the type of guy who needs some time to make a decision, had a hard time even getting the time a mere mortal like Tyler Thigpen would require. But&#8230;. hell&#8230;. who are you gonna put in to take O&#8217;Callaghan&#8217;s spot?</p>
<p>That last question was rhetorical. This one is not: who are you gonna put in to take Matt Cassel&#8217;s spot? We all know Brodie Croyle to be a superior athlete to Cassel, but he didn&#8217;t look like the answer on Friday. He was wildly inconsistent, which is about par for the course for a Brodie Croyle preseason. Behind Brodie is Tyler Palko. I&#8217;ve had gas with stronger passing skills than Tyler Palko.</p>
<p>Finally, let&#8217;s talk about the two pleasant rookie surprises, Kendrick Lewis and Javier Arenas. Whereas Eric Berry and Dexter McCluster, and perhaps even John Asamoah to a point, were expected to deliver immediately (all three did an acceptable job for their first time out of the gate), nothing was expected of Lewis, and the only thing expected of Arenas was to not be crazy like his bonehead cousin (NBA player/avid gun enthusiast Gilbert Arenas, in case you hadn&#8217;t already made the connection). Both were dominant in their respective phases of the game (I don&#8217;t believe that Arenas is really expected to contribute much defensively), and, provided they maintain some semblance of this level of play, both will see significant playing time.</p>
<p>To recap, players I like: Charles, Wiegmann, Asamoah, Dorsey, Gilberry, Studebaker, Hali, Flowers, Lewis, Arenas, and the kickers (I won&#8217;t hold the two 53-yarders against Succop).</p>
<p>Players I don&#8217;t like: Cassel, Palko, Kestahn Moore, O&#8217;Callaghan, Edwards, Jackson, Demorrio Williams,</p>
<p>Players who could potentially impress me, but haven&#8217;t yet: the entire receiving corps (tight ends included), Thomas Jones, Leggett, Berry, McGraw, Morgan. Yeah, I said it&#8230;. DaJuan Morgan might yet impress me.</p>
<p>Players who probably won&#8217;t impress me this season, but aren&#8217;t terrible: Croyle, Waters, Lilja (good player, but not at right guard), Niswanger, Vrabel, Carr, Gafford.</p>
<p>All of this, of course, is based on one game&#8217;s worth of observation, so all four lists are subject to change.</p>
<p>Final negative note: That was one of the worst officiated games I have ever witnessed.<br />
Final positive note: No Wade Smith.</p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5623-nks-preseason-game-1-evaluation/">Home Of The Chiefs forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/preseason-evaluation-game-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ell Roberson Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/the-ell-roberson-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/the-ell-roberson-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember last offseason when everyone bitched about Brett Favre&#8217;s retiring/un-retiring dominating the sports news? Or the offseason before when everyone bitched about Brett Favre&#8217;s retiring/un-retiring dominating the sports news? Well, this year it was a foregone conclusion that he was going to play again. As it turns out, that might not be the case, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember last offseason when everyone bitched about Brett Favre&#8217;s retiring/un-retiring dominating the sports news? Or the offseason before when everyone bitched about Brett Favre&#8217;s retiring/un-retiring dominating the sports news? Well, this year it was a foregone conclusion that he was going to play again. As it turns out, that might not be the case, but the story didn&#8217;t dominate the sports news until today.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d love it if Brett Favre had dominated the sports news this offseason. It&#8217;s so much more palatable than the story we were stuck with instead.<span id="more-316"></span></p>
<p>On the subject of foregone conclusions, it&#8217;s a foregone conclusion that athletes are unable (and often unwilling) to control their hormones. I don&#8217;t think I believe that, or at least not to a degree any greater than the rest of us. They just get more (and often better) opportunities to express that emotion, and when they&#8217;re caught (or even just suspected), it becomes a matter of national discussion. By comparison, if I were married (thank God I&#8217;m not) and elected to cheat on my wife (thank God I wouldn&#8217;t), Mike &#038; Mike wouldn&#8217;t give a damn (unless one of them was related to my wife, and even then it still wouldn&#8217;t make the show).</p>
<p>Thus, allegations of sexual impropriety are taken at face value. So are allegations of violence, probably due to the nature of the occupation. The consequences of the former are purely personal. Nobody in professional sports loses a job over an alcohol-fueled misadventure with an exotic dancer in Miami after an away game. The consequences of the latter are far greater, but, unlike adultery, the sin itself leaves its own concrete, visible evidence, and is far more likely to have been witnessed. Therefore, an athlete isn&#8217;t likely to be accused of punching a guy in the face unless he actually punched a guy in the face.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s Ben Roethlisberger. Or Kobe Bryant. Or the Duke lacrosse team.</p>
<p>My mother dedicated the latter part of her working life to a division of United Way that assists in counseling and legal preparation for victims of sexual assault. In the absence of extenuating circumstances (i.e. other signs of physical abuse) it&#8217;s a crime that&#8217;s nearly impossible to prosecute. Because consent is so difficult to prove, guilt is never a foregone conclusion for anyone, regardless of occupation.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, accusation is sometimes used as a weapon. It can be used as a means of extortion against a politician or a wealthy celebrity. It can also be used, as we&#8217;ve discovered and rediscovered again and again over the last decade, against an athlete as a means of distraction. I call it the Ell Roberson Effect. I use Ell because in his case the accusation was egregious, the timing obvious, and the subject woefully ill-equipped to deal with that sort of adversity. Consequently, the accusation had its intended effect. Ell shat the bed the following day in the Fiesta Bowl, completing a little under 40% of his passes.</p>
<p>Because these accusations are so frequently used as weapons, they no longer hold currency with us. When someone of fame or wealth is accused of sexual assault, we&#8217;ve become trained to eschew the accusation as baseless. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s a Pavlovian knee jerk reaction that&#8217;s unique to modern American society or if it&#8217;s a biological imperative on the basis of disbelief that anyone could commit an act so heinous. I do know, however, that we&#8217;ll reconsider that position if (A) the accused is a repeat subject of accusation, or (B) if the accused has a reputation for being a complete bastard.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s where this summer&#8217;s story comes into play: Ben Roethlisberger fits both of those descriptions. Just ask Andrea McNulty or Terry Bradshaw. They&#8217;ll be happy to elaborate. Ben&#8217;s personality makes this newest accusation completely believable. More troubling, however, is the timing. The accusation was not made midseason or preseason. It was made during tax season. The victim wasn&#8217;t seeking money; thus, there was, ostensibly, nothing to gain.</p>
<p>His guilt, however, is a foregone conclusion, and, as with any foregone conclusion, is subject to being just plain wrong. Its basis may be rooted in fact, but is it based in enough fact for any of us to state with certainty that what we believe to have happened actually happened? What seems plain enough to you and I didn&#8217;t seem plain enough to a district attorney to press charges. It seemed plain enough to Roger Goodell to issue a suspension that will likely cost the Steelers a chance at a playoff appearance, but Goodell doesn&#8217;t make it a point to operate with only facts in mind. Thus, in a sense, if the intent of the accuser was to invoke the Ell Roberson Effect, she was successful in doing so, albeit in a rather unusual way.</p>
<p>Somehow I kinda doubt that was the intent, however.</p>
<p>There is no greater moral lesson to today&#8217;s story. There are no lessons in life or in football for me to impart. The morality is self-contained, and none of it is new. Keep your junk in your pants. Don&#8217;t tell lies to get your way. Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover. Then again, maybe I&#8217;m making a foregone conclusion by thinking you apply these principles in your lives already. If so, here&#8217;s the moral lesson: keep your junk in your pants. Don&#8217;t tell lies to get your way. Don&#8217;t judge a book by its cover.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to be back, sports fans. Who wants to talk about Brett Favre? </p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5567-the-ell-roberson-effect/">Home Of The Chiefs Forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/08/the-ell-roberson-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Berry signed!</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/07/eric-berry-signed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/07/eric-berry-signed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>penguin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Berry gets 6 years $60 million max with $34 guaranteed from the Chiefs &#8211; highest paid safety in NFL history Twitter&#8211;Jason La Canfora]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Berry gets 6 years $60 million max with $34 guaranteed from the Chiefs &#8211; highest paid safety in NFL history</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/JasonLaCanfora/status/19928155899">Twitter&#8211;Jason La Canfora</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/07/eric-berry-signed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsuccessfully Coping With The Natural Beauty Of Infidelity</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/05/unsuccessfully-coping-with-the-natural-beauty-of-infidelity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/05/unsuccessfully-coping-with-the-natural-beauty-of-infidelity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 02:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Steele, singer and bassist for the band Type O Negative and onetime Playgirl centerfold model, died last month of heart failure. Afterward, I made my customary dead celebrity jokes, none of which were in good taste. I did the same when Michael Jackson died a year ago. This deeply offended a few of my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Steele, singer and bassist for the band Type O Negative and onetime Playgirl centerfold model, died last month of heart failure. Afterward, I made my customary dead celebrity jokes, none of which were in good taste. I did the same when Michael Jackson died a year ago. This deeply offended a few of my acquaintances. I was unfriended on Facebook by two people over a remark about Jackson looking at the man in the mirror and seeing dead people. This time around, there was no outrage (or faux-outrage, as I&#8217;m positive the majority of the offended hadn&#8217;t listened to the King of Pop at any point in the decade prior). Reactions ranged from indifference to amusement.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the moral of the story? If you want complete strangers to feign sorrow of your passing, don&#8217;t write borderline unlistenable goth metal.</p>
<p>What does any of this have to do with Kansas City football? Nothing, aside from the fact that the title of one of Steele&#8217;s better known songs made a good title for an article about Dwayne Bowe. Unsuccessfully Coping With The Natural Beauty Of Infidelity was written from the perspective of an individual whose significant other is unable to control his/her hormonal inclinations. Perhaps, then, I should have gone with Ludacris&#8217;s Hoes In Different Area Codes instead.<span id="more-308"></span></p>
<p>In case any of you missed yesterday&#8217;s news, Dwayne Bowe suffered a minor case of diarrhea of the mouth and told an ESPN reporter that some of his teammates aren&#8217;t completely faithful to their wives or girlfriends. Apparently some of them like to have hotel parties on traveling weeks. Some of them fly in specific girls. Others pick dance partners from the abundance of loose trim congregating in the players&#8217; rooms. Sometimes the girls bring cameras and try to take pictures with the players for their Facebook pages. Wives and girlfriends aren&#8217;t fond of this practice, and thus the players themselves don&#8217;t care for it much either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you a moment to absorb that, as I&#8217;m sure none of you could have pictured such a thing happening. No Kansas City player has ever, for instance, fathered seven children by five women. The fact that some young women are gold diggers and starf**ckers is probably equally shocking, so I&#8217;ll give you yet another moment.</p>
<p>Better yet?</p>
<p>That an athlete is cheating on his spouse isn&#8217;t news. That a teammate alluded to said infidelity in an interview isn&#8217;t news either, nor is the fact that said teammate categorically absolved himself from any wrongdoing. Bowe doesn&#8217;t need to don sunglasses and weep-speak the words &#8220;that&#8217;s my quarterback&#8221; to make amends to his teammates. He didn&#8217;t name names; ergo, no harm, no foul.</p>
<p>It was, however, a boneheaded move. As a first round draft pick entering his fourth year of service, he should be aiming to assert himself as a leader of his team. This maneuver won&#8217;t endear him to teammates, coaches, front office personnel, or anyone else who wields the ability to influence his future. Say, for instance, that you&#8217;re Brodie Croyle. Say, for instance, that you replaced Matt Cassel as the starter after the bye week. Say, for instance, that it&#8217;s week 14, and you&#8217;re headed off to California to play the Chargers. Shortly before leaving your house to board the plane, Kelli gives you an early Christmas present: a long, drawn out inquiry as to whether or not you have any potential guests awaiting your arrival.</p>
<p>Now say, for instance, that you&#8217;re in the red zone. Casey Wiegmann snaps you the ball. The protection is solid. You&#8217;re comfortable in the pocket. You scan through your reads. Dwayne Bowe is open in the end zone. So is Chris Chambers. As you cock your arm back to throw, you hear Kelli&#8217;s voice in your head. Who gets the ball?</p>
<p>I have no serious concern of the aforementioned events taking place for a bevy of reasons, the most significant of which is that Todd Haley won&#8217;t let Dwayne Bowe anywhere near the endzone if he continues to drop passes. I am concerned, however, that this may be a ploy. Kevin Kietzman&#8211;a bastion of reliable information&#8211;speculated today that this, combined with Bowe&#8217;s penchant for putting the ball on the ground, might be grounds to consider a trade. Maybe he&#8217;s right. Maybe it&#8217;s best for the Chiefs and Bowe to part ways. But if that&#8217;s the decision made by Haley and Scott Pioli, I&#8217;m concerned that it sets a dangerous precedent.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know very many Chiefs fans that were sorry to see Larry Johnson go away. Larry played well below his pay grade and generally made an ass out of himself whenever possible, be it at home, online, or in the club. I was a major proponent of that transaction. With Bowe, however, regardless of what he does or how badly he plays, I don&#8217;t think the Chiefs can afford to lose him. If he is traded or allowed to walk, it sends a clear message to the rest of the team: if you want out, screw up on the field, then go home and screw up some more.</p>
<p>Love him or hate him, the organization has in its recent past an excellent role model for how to handle these situations: Carl Peterson. Carl didn&#8217;t bargain with or cave to the demands of disgruntled employees. Haley&#8217;s and Pioli&#8217;s approach, as demonstrated thus far, is a stolid declaration of My Way Or The Highway. With Peterson, there was no highway. That&#8217;s exactly the attitude that needs to be in place in the front office right now. Park Bowe on the bench. Send him out to make tackles on special teams. If necessary, don&#8217;t even suit him up. Petition Roger Goodell to instate a new roster status: Psychologically Unable to Perform. Just keep him on the roster. Let the players know that the only way out of a contract early is to genuinely suck at your job.</p>
<p>Some would contend, of course, that Bowe has already accomplished exactly that. He hasn&#8217;t. Even in a down year, he&#8217;s a 600 yard receiver. Terrance Copper has barely more than that for his entire career, and he&#8217;s headed into his eighth season. Bowe is a phenomenally gifted athlete, and thus he accomplishes more on autopilot than most players are capable of under any circumstance. Copper could put in the kind of study time Priest Holmes did, and he still wouldn&#8217;t be close to Bowe&#8217;s level. In other words, Bowe is everything you&#8217;d expect from an LSU alum. Still, sans a backup plan and compensation commensurate with his talent, there can be no highway. For nothing else than the sake of preserving order, for the remainder of his contract, Bowe must remain a Chief.</p>
<p>Unless he starts writing borderline unlistenable goth metal. If I hear him singing any Seals &#038; Crofts song&#8230;. ANY Seals &#038; Crofts song&#8230;. all bets are off. </p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5361-unsuccessfully-coping-with-the-natural-beauty-of-infidelity/">Home Of The Chiefs forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/05/unsuccessfully-coping-with-the-natural-beauty-of-infidelity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Plays, and The Players Who Make Them</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/05/making-plays-and-the-players-who-make-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/05/making-plays-and-the-players-who-make-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 04:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathankent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold! It&#8217;s the time of year when every draft pick is a future repeat Pro Bowler. It&#8217;s a unique point in the life of a rookie player. A Brandon Carr can be magically transformed into the next Dale Carter. Through the magic of a first name in common, Derrick Johnson can prematurely be crowned the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold! It&#8217;s the time of year when every draft pick is a future repeat Pro Bowler. It&#8217;s a unique point in the life of a rookie player. A Brandon Carr can be magically transformed into the next Dale Carter. Through the magic of a first name in common, Derrick Johnson can prematurely be crowned the reincarnation of Derrick Thomas. Tre Stallings is the next Will Shields, and Brian Johnston is the next Jared Allen.</p>
<p>Congruences are sought out by necessity. Fans don&#8217;t have the time or the resources to make qualitative analyses of every player available (the ones who claim they have are lying through their teeth). Opinions are based on stat sheets, talking heads, and fan-assembled youtube highlight reels. Thus, from April to August, followers fantasize about what may or may not come to pass in autumn, and while intellectually aware that most draft picks don&#8217;t pan out, it&#8217;s impossible not to dream a little bit.</p>
<p>Bearing that in mind, I now offer you my ill informed, premature opinion of the Kansas City Chiefs&#8217; 2010 draft.<span id="more-303"></span></p>
<p>Nobody ever accused Gunther Cunningham a draft genius. Nobody should accuse Scott Pioli of being one either. Pioli presided over some of the worst drafts in Patriots history. His 2000 draft is considered by many to be a success based solely on the fact that he secured franchise quarterback and Matt Damon stunt double Tom Brady in the 6th round. What that draft&#8217;s proponents fail to ignore is that its second most successful player was 7th round fullback Patrick Pass, and that his two first day selections gave him a combined total 15 starts. To put that in perspective, Gunther&#8217;s three first day picks from the same year gave Kansas City a combined total of 148 starts, and one of those three was a coulda-been whose career was cut dramatically short by a busted knee that never healed.</p>
<p>I never hesitate my fondness for how and who the Steelers draft. Pittsburgh&#8217;s four first day picks in 2000 gave them 208 starts, then soldiered on to give their subsequent teams 203 more. All but one&#8211;Pro Bowl left tackle Marvel Smith&#8211;is still an active player. In 10 years they&#8217;ve produced two duds in the first three rounds&#8211;linebackers Alonzo Jackson and Bruce Davis. Even Ricardo Colclough can&#8217;t be deemed a complete failure, given that he gave them two solid years as a kick returner. Their ability to consistently produce has kept them at the top of the heap, and year after year the foundation of their team is built on guys drafted in the four or five years prior.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Patriots, who looked to be the new dynasty for several years of the past decade, are slowly unraveling. Their last five drafts have yielded four starters: Brandon Meriweather, Jerrod Mayo, Logan Mankins, and Nick Kaczur. They&#8217;re on the cusp of being non-competitive in a division that, for several years, has been non-competitive.</p>
<p>The guy who made that possible is now our guy.</p>
<p>Back when Boston could do no wrong in the eyes of the sports world, Pioli&#8217;s drafts were lovingly characterized as &#8220;drafting for depth.&#8221; That&#8217;s a clever euphemism for &#8220;took a bunch of guys who are gonna suck.&#8221; There&#8217;s something different about this draft. Maybe it&#8217;s the influence of Todd Haley. Maybe Todd acquired some of that Pittsburgh drafting prowess from his dear old dad. Or, perhaps, maybe Pioli just looked at the roster and realized that for the first time since he left Cleveland in 1996, he wasn&#8217;t working with a winning cast.</p>
<p>Either way, this wasn&#8217;t a draft for depth. Twice during Pioli&#8217;s tenure in New England the team traded down into eight picks in rounds 4 through 7, and twice more down to seven late rounders. Never in his career has he parlayed his way into five high round picks. Then again, by the same token, never in his career has he so badly needed to pick high early and often. I&#8217;ll be the first to say that a couple of the picks don&#8217;t make sense to me, but there weren&#8217;t any What The Hell picks á la DaJuan Morgan or Kris Wilson. None of these players are questionable to make the roster. They&#8217;re direct replacements for the following: Mike Brown, Bobby Wade, Maurice Leggett, Wade Smith, Jake O&#8217;Connell, DaJuan Morgan, and possibly Mike Vrabel. Aside from Leggett, I can&#8217;t picture myself missing anybody off that list.</p>
<p>This group was selected to rack up touchdowns, make interceptions, and to return kicks to the 40 yard line.</p>
<p>When I think back over the last three years, what this team has been missing is touchdowns, interceptions, and kicks returned to the 40 yard line.</p>
<p>Call me crazy, but this business of hiring guys to rack up touchdowns, make interceptions, and return kicks to the 40 yard line&#8230;. Well&#8230;. I think it might work. </p>
<p>Want to discuss this article? Join us at the <a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/forums/index.php/topic/5298-making-plays-and-the-players-who-make-them/">Home Of The Chiefs Forum.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/05/making-plays-and-the-players-who-make-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chiefs Select Eric Berry with 5th overall pick in the 2010 NFL draft.</title>
		<link>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/04/chiefs-select-eric-berry-with-5th-overall-pick-in-the-2010-nfl-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/04/chiefs-select-eric-berry-with-5th-overall-pick-in-the-2010-nfl-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>penguin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KC Chiefs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_301" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ERICBERRYPIC.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-301 " title="ERICBERRYPIC" src="http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ERICBERRYPIC-300x132.jpg" alt="Eric Berry KC Chiefs #5 pick" width="300" height="132" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Eric Berry is selected by the Kansas City Chiefs.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.homeofthechiefs.com/2010/04/chiefs-select-eric-berry-with-5th-overall-pick-in-the-2010-nfl-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
